--- description: Learn more about SylogistMission ERP pricing, benefits, and disadvantages for your business in Canada. Read verified software reviews and find tools that fit your business needs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: SylogistMission ERP Pricing, Reviews & Features - Capterra Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Nonprofit Software](/directory/30805/nonprofit/software) > [SylogistMission ERP](/software/74197/sylogistmission-erp) # SylogistMission ERP Canonical: https://www.capterra.ca/software/74197/sylogistmission-erp Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.ca/software/74197/sylogistmission-erp?page=2) > Amplify your impact with SylogistMission ERP built on Dynamics 365. Streamline operations, boost transparency, and enhance efficiency. > > Verdict: Rated **3.9/5** by 21 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses SylogistMission ERP? SylogistMission ERP is purpose-built for non-profit organizations, NGOs, research institutes, tribal governments, dioceses and faith-based organizations. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **3.9/5** | 21 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 3.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Sylogist - **Founded**: 1999 ## Commercial Context - **Target Audience**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Canada, United States ## Features - Accounting Software - Accounts Payable Software - Accounts Receivable Software - Bank Reconciliation - Billing & Invoicing - Budget Management - Budgeting/Forecasting - Cash Management - Donation Tracking - Financial Management Software - Financial Reporting Software - For Nonprofits - Fund Accounting Software - General Ledger - Grant Management Software - Invoice Management - Invoice Processing - Payment Processing Software - Reporting & Statistics - Revenue Recognition ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base Software - Phone Support ## Category - [Nonprofit Software](https://www.capterra.ca/directory/30805/nonprofit/software) ## Related Categories - [Nonprofit Software](https://www.capterra.ca/directory/30805/nonprofit/software) - [Nonprofit Accounting Software](https://www.capterra.ca/directory/31355/nonprofit-accounting/software) - [Project Accounting Software](https://www.capterra.ca/directory/32657/project-accounting/software) - [Fund Accounting Software](https://www.capterra.ca/directory/30114/fund-accounting/software) - [Medical Accounting Software](https://www.capterra.ca/directory/32589/medical-accounting/software) ## Alternatives 1. [NetSuite](https://www.capterra.ca/software/135757/netsuite) — 4.2/5 (2003 reviews) 2. [Sage Intacct](https://www.capterra.ca/software/76/intacct) — 4.3/5 (608 reviews) 3. [MIP Accounting](https://www.capterra.ca/software/116591/MIP-Accounting) — 4.1/5 (69 reviews) 4. [Aplos](https://www.capterra.ca/software/118759/aplos-accounting) — 4.5/5 (182 reviews) 5. [QuickBooks Online Advanced](https://www.capterra.ca/software/189398/quickbooks-online) — 4.4/5 (1037 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Very good software with a lot of useful content." — 4.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *June 21, 2018* > > **Pros**: What I liked the most about the software is that it offers a lot of useful information and educational content to teachers, especially in the area of reading comprehension strategies and formative assessments. > > **Cons**: If I am totally honest, so far I do not have any complaints about this Software and its features. I like it. ----- ### "Serenic navigator assessment" — 4.0/5 > **Bambo** | *September 28, 2021* | Nonprofit Organization Management | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The rationale of the functionalities, the intelligence, the logic link between features, the ledger entries reports cohérences, the flexibility of the report customization based on need, link and logic between: award, subaward, PO, PPI, payment journals vs applied etc… > > **Cons**: Jet reports. The report associated to serenic to provide reports like trial balances, creditor balances, budget versus actual etc… was not as performing as of our expectations. As a consequence it was replaced by power bi 5 years later. > > A very good experience. At the beginning I had a problem to accept serenic because i had problems to accept changes with previous system but after two good years of learning trying doing mistakes and correcting I finally discover an excellent system on serenic very easy to drive when the get the logic of it vs your accounting need. ----- ### "Decent HR Payroll system" — 3.0/5 > **Aman** | *May 31, 2018* | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Pros**: The ability to customize the fields, run meaningful reports to pull all the data fields, quick search to bring employee data, feature to build, schedule and run interfaces with other HR applications. > > **Cons**: Launch of the navigator, server distribution to balance the load, difficulty in finding the data from back end sources of multiple similar looking tables. > > We manage the entire HR employee data using this application. It is a system of records for a company of 4000+ employees. ----- ### "Serenic Navigator is the best" — 4.0/5 > **Patrick** | *February 1, 2017* | Research | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: 1. IAVI implemented the Awardvision grants management tool as a full component of our financial processes 2. Thanks to Serenic Navigator's very powerful reporting tools (i.e., Jet Reports and Cube), grant managers can now create reports directly from the accounting software, and budget managers can view their actuals vs. budgets in real time. 4. IAVI now seamlessly produces quarterly consolidated financial statements via the Cube. 5. IAVI is using the Navigator workflow management process and a few basic validation rules to streamline the authorization and allocation of expenses to Fund/Award and Project. 6. The drill-down functionality of the software makes it easy to navigate through accounting transactions and provides a great audit trail. IAVI made an extensive use of Attributes to pool expenses together according to the management requirements. -IAVI has cut in half the time required to produce quarterly financial statements. -IAVI virtually eliminated miscoding and the subsequent need to reclassify expenses. -IAVI has decreased from 4 weeks to 2 weeks the time required after the end of a pay period to upload the allocated payroll into the financial system. -IAVI has reduced to zero the time required for uploading corporate credit card expenses post-approval. -IAVI has real-time balances on all authorized POS without relying on external systems (ContractCentral). -IAVI has received timely and attentive customer support for all issues submitted. > > **Cons**: The Revenue Recognition module is maybe too complex. > > I have done 2 implementation of the software: in 2007 with Action Against Hunger USA and 2015 with International AIDS Vaccine Initiative. I love the dimensions, the multicurrency features, A/P, Bank, G/L AND AwardVision, as well as the great reporting capabilities (using the Cube). IAVI wanted an accounting solution that integrated with Awards management, Budget, Purchase Requisition and Purchase Orders. Also we wanted a system that could work with multiple currencies, didn't require customization, very user friendly, and integrated well with Microsoft products. The software had to be supported and maintained by a dynamic company with an excellent reputation and strong experience working in the not-for-profit sector. The software had to be easy to connect to from anywhere in the world (via Citrix or any other web-based protocol) and offer the possibility of migration to a cloud-based hosting environment. IAVI was looking for a solution that would provide easy consolidation between multiple subsidiaries, strong analytical functionality, and powerful reporting capacity. Last but not least, excellent support and maintenance services were essential, both from the original manufacturer and from a robust network of third party consultants and vendors. Coming from a complex system entirely customized that required a dedicated team for maintenance on an on-going basis, we were looking for an off-the-shelf, user-friendly product requiring minimal maintenance. 1. IAVI wanted to find a solution that could be used more widely than just by the accounting team. A real management tool. 2. IAVI wanted to stop working in silos and have the financial information stored in one place for use by all of the various stakeholders (purchasers, budget managers, project managers, grant managers, accounting and payroll staff, senior management,'). 3. IAVI wanted to run a powerful financial system without needing a dedicated technical support team. 4. IAVI wanted to report in real time and readily close the books on a monthly and quarterly basis. 5. IAVI wanted a system that could easily manage the authorization and coding of expenses. 6. IAVI wanted a solution that provided a great audit trail. When you buy the Serenic Navigator, you become part of a big family of fantastic professionals. Serenic maintains a very personalized relationship with all its clients. Also each Serenic client can learn from other Serenic clients via the NGO usergroup. ----- ### "Government Education" — 5.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *February 19, 2019* | Education Management | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **Pros**: I like that it was free. I liked that they supplied all the things we would need to fulfill the requirements for the year. I liked the interactive classroom feature. I liked the speedback assignments where you could know immediately how well you did on a lesson. > > **Cons**: I didn't like that it is government led education that has a bias. I didn't like the overwhelming amounts of work. No child in public education has that much work on a daily basis. > > It was difficult to complete the minimum requirement of the entire year on time. It sapped you for time on a daily basis. There was no way to skim through a lesson. All the i's had to be dotted and t's crossed before moving on. There was only one field trip that I was aware of the entire year and the main reason I wanted to use this homeschool was to explore more of my community. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.ca/software/74197/sylogistmission-erp?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.ca/software/74197/sylogistmission-erp) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Structured Data