--- description: Learn more about ShireSystem pricing, benefits, and disadvantages for your business in Canada. Read verified software reviews and find tools that fit your business needs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ShireSystem Pricing, Reviews & Features - Capterra Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Facility Management Software](/directory/30211/facility-management/software) > [ShireSystem](/software/207258/shiresystem) # ShireSystem Canonical: https://www.capterra.ca/software/207258/shiresystem Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.ca/software/207258/shiresystem?page=2) > CMMS maintenance and asset management software for asset maintenance in manufacturing sectors. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 47 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses ShireSystem? ShireSystem is used globally across the food and drink, manufacturing, pharmaceutical, chemical and public sector sectors as a SaaS based solution. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.5/5** | 47 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Elecosoft - **Founded**: 1895 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: £120.00 - **Pricing model**: Per User (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: ShireSystem provides a range of CMMS plans tailored to suit organisations of all sizes, budgets, and levels of maintenance maturity. Each plan is strategically designed to support your current needs, accelerate your progress, and deliver measurable returns on investment at every stage of your maintenance journey. Save More as You Grow – The price per user drops with every additional licence - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Windows (Desktop), Android (Mobile), iPhone (Mobile), iPad (Mobile) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Faroe Islands, Finland, France, Germany, Gibraltar, Greece, Greenland, Guernsey and 33 more ## Features - Activity Tracking - Asset Tracking Software - Audit Trail - Billing & Invoicing - Calibration Management Software - Check-in/Check-out - Document Management Software - Equipment Tracking - Inspection Management - Inventory Control Software - Inventory Management Software - Job Management - Maintenance Management Software - Maintenance Scheduling - Mobile Access - Predictive Maintenance - Preventive Maintenance Software - Reminders - Reporting/Analytics - Scheduling Software - Service History - Technician Management - Third-Party Integrations - Vendor Management Software - Warranty Tracking - Work Order Management ## Integrations (2 total) - ERP - Power BI Connector for Jira ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Phone Support - Chat ## Category - [Facility Management Software](https://www.capterra.ca/directory/30211/facility-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Facility Management Software](https://www.capterra.ca/directory/30211/facility-management/software) - [CMMS Software](https://www.capterra.ca/directory/30032/cmms/software) - [Maintenance Management Software](https://www.capterra.ca/directory/30058/maintenance-management/software) - [Building Maintenance Software](https://www.capterra.ca/directory/30102/building-maintenance/software) - [Equipment Maintenance Software](https://www.capterra.ca/directory/30103/equipment-maintenance/software) ## Alternatives 1. [MaintainX](https://www.capterra.ca/software/179296/getmaintainx) — 4.8/5 (1005 reviews) 2. [Limble](https://www.capterra.ca/software/162600/limble-cmms) — 4.8/5 (738 reviews) 3. [eMaint CMMS](https://www.capterra.ca/software/100468/emaint-cmms) — 4.5/5 (384 reviews) 4. [Maintenance Connection](https://www.capterra.ca/software/12444/maintenance-connection) — 4.4/5 (443 reviews) 5. [Fracttal One](https://www.capterra.ca/software/159911/fracttal) — 4.6/5 (1773 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Good CMMS - strong WO/PPM controll, UI needs tightening up" — 4.0/5 > **MIchael** | *January 13, 2026* | Construction | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: \*It’s a proper CMMS that can handle a real factory, not just a spreadsheet with fancy buttons. \*PPM / WO control is strong once you’ve got your asset register and job plans set right. \*Good structure for assets, locations, job plans, parts, history etc. Helps drive standards and stops the “we’ll remember it in our heads” nonsense. \*Backlog visibility is decent. You can actually see what’s overdue, what’s waiting parts, what’s waiting labour, what’s shutdown, etc. \*Reporting is useful for compliance and for catching bad habits (people closing jobs wrong, using wrong assets, no failure codes etc). > > **Cons**: \*The newer “fresh” look is a bit too uniform- every tab/window looks the same, so it’s dead easy to hit the wrong “+” and do the wrong thing, for example: you think you’re adding parts to a work order, but you’ve actually started creating a brand new work order. Hence me using the old icons/look, actually. \*If your master data is messy (assets, BoMs, stock, locations) it will show up straight away. It’s not a “magic fix” – you still need to do the hard yards. \*Adoption is the real battle. If production report breakdowns on radios and nobody logs it, the system looks bad -but that’s people/process, not the software. \*Performance can feel a bit slow at times. Could be our servers, but it’s noticeably slower than what we’ve seen in demos / meetings. > > Overall it’s been a good system for bringing order to maintenance planning. We run a heavy manufacturing site and the big win is having one place for work orders, planned maintenance, spares, and history. Once you start using it properly, you stop losing jobs, you stop repeating the same failures without learning, and you can actually plan shutdown work with some confidence. It does take effort up front – asset register, job plans, frequencies, spares, user training, and basic discipline (correct assets, failure coding, proper close-out). If the site isn’t willing to do that, any CMMS will struggle. For day to day planning it works well: you can build a weekly plan, manage overdue work, keep the system clean, and get decent KPI visibility without turning it into admin for the sake of admin. ----- ### "Contracts manager" — 3.0/5 > **Alex** | *January 6, 2026* | Construction | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Pros**: Effective way to track jobs with good tools to check if jobs are running over due or on time, good for tracking multiple contracts > > **Cons**: Can be very slow and crashes often. Particularly with raising invoices. A feature to auto calculate costs on jobs would be brilliant. > > When its working well its great but the speed issues at times cause problems during business critical moments ----- ### "A solid CMMS system and essential tool for work management & compliance" — 4.0/5 > **Lee** | *January 8, 2026* | Food Production | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: The User interface is friendly and easy to navigate. The features are mostly everything that we need for a day to day work management. The work orders can have as little or as much information submitted as we require and the document management section more than adequately covers our audit requirements. Therea re multiple ways to complete jobs using the desktop version and the mobile app. Spare parts can be added to a work order and booked out individually once you have set your inventory up on the system. Options are available to use the dashboard view or a BI connector to get the data you require. Plenty of additional modules available for what requirements you need, permit to work, wallboard, purchasing, etc. The mobile app works quite well for work management across all our teams. > > **Cons**: You can't click into the asset data from a work order and this can be frustrating as you end up having multiple tabs open. There are lots of report templates available but none give me quite what I need and we end up exporting data to excel and creating our own shift reports. This is mainly as you can create teams but there is no filter for teams on the reports templates. > > We have an Engineering Team of around 75 people across 3 sites and use the desktop and mobile pro version with around 60 mobile licences. Overall we have a positive experience with Shire System and it gives us what we need from a work management and compliance point of view to ISO45001, ISO9001 and FSSC 22000. We are currently uploading our inventory to Shire and will be expanding to use the purchasing module in 2026. ----- ### "How NTS progressed using ShireSystem for Asset Management." — 5.0/5 > **Jon** | *December 1, 2025* | Logistics & Supply Chain | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: I could not find another CMMS that matched Shires spec at the price point when NTS was looking to implement an asset management database. I can implement new ways of carrying out work with the way we can customise work orders without constantly going back to the system supply. It’s impossible to list all the advantages we as a business get from using the Shire system within are business units. > > **Cons**: I am being honest in saying there is nothing I dislike about the system and if there was I just call up the support team and see what changes we can make like making another field mandatory and they change it for me at no cost. > > I think the best way I can explain using Shire is like working with a family business. I have worked in systems for over 30 years and they can be demanding, expensive and difficult to work with, but nothing seems to be to difficult for Elecosoft to resolve. ----- ### "Transforming Engineering and Operations: A Game-Changer for Our Organisation" — 5.0/5 > **Derrick** | *November 24, 2025* | Mechanical or Industrial Engineering | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The system delivers exceptional value for money and has significantly enhanced our organisation’s efficiency and performance. Shire System allows our team to track work orders, monitor equipment health, and reduce downtime effectively. Its design ensures that even new users can navigate the system without extensive training, which saves time and boosts productivity. > > **Cons**: Technology is moving fast Updates – updates should be automated and not require additional resources. > > Its impact is evident in streamlined processes, improved productivity, and measurable cost savings. This investment is proving to be a strategic asset, driving engineering excellence and supporting our long-term goals. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.ca/software/207258/shiresystem?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.ca/software/207258/shiresystem) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | ----- ## Structured Data