WebLOAD

Webload very good for Scripting, Running Load tests and Reporting. Very ease of use

Pros:

IDE is very simple to use, and the Help file content was very useful. Very easy to handle Webload Console and Analytics graphs will be easier for the clients to understand.

Cons:

No proper documentation to install the tool in Microsoft Azure or AWS cloud.

Alternatives Considered: LoadRunner Cloud

Great Overall Product that fit for our business

Comments: The easy scripting and open nature of the load testing framework makes WebLoad a great tool in the toolboxes of any test engineers.

Pros:

The JS with custom functions were easy to write scripts in and fast to implement. The vUser parameters and use of the load generators were straight forward to implement the behaviors we wish to replicate as well.

Cons:

Sometimes the agent that manages the remote load testing execution was unstable, so we had to implement some restart actions prior to running our load tests. It wasn't a critical problem, but was a simple solution we added to our load testing process.

Powerful tool for testing load

Pros:

1) it is really helpful for testing the performance of the application by putting the load on application via this tool. 2) it builds the load In very efficient and easy way. 3) it supports many technologies like selenium to mobile. 4) it has play and record functionality which helps to capture results.

Cons:

I am happy to use it. I had great reporting features also. So I don’t have any dislikes for this software.

Webload for vetting performance

Pros:

Ability to hit DV hard in small intervals

Cons:

Sometimes differences in results that can be difficult to explain

WebLoad user for 19 years

Comments: The fact that i use it already 19 years, prefering it over other competitors

Pros:

It do the job that i required: load and performancge testing. Helpful support. Relatively not expensive.

Cons:

The IDE performance of some features require improvement