--- description: Learn more about Decloak - Web security intelligence pricing, benefits, and disadvantages for your business in Canada. Read verified software reviews and find tools that fit your business needs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Decloak - Web security intelligence Pricing, Reviews & Features - Capterra Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Vulnerability Scanner Tools](/directory/32775/vulnerability-scanner/software) > [Decloak - Web security intelligence](/software/1244132/Decloak-Web-security-intelligence) # Decloak - Web security intelligence Canonical: https://www.capterra.ca/software/1244132/Decloak-Web-security-intelligence > Cloud-based web security intelligence tool that identifies anonymous visitors, detects bots and malicious actors, and provides. > > Verdict: Rated **5.0/5** by 1 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses Decloak - Web security intelligence? Businesses of all sizes in e-commerce, SaaS, financial services, and media industries seeking to identify malicious or anonymous web traffic and protect digital assets from fraud and bots. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **5.0/5** | 1 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 5.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 5.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 5.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 5.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 100% | (10/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Sparrow Technology ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) - **Pricing Details**: Start free and upgrade when you need more. Every plan, including Free, runs all 8 scan layers and gives you an A–F grade in about 15 seconds, with no credit card needed. Paid plans add AI agent investigations, larger multi-page scans, scheduled monitoring, compliance control mapping and, on Enterprise, active testing and AI pentesting that confirms which issues can actually be exploited. - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: United Kingdom ## Features - API - Alerts/Notifications - Reporting/Analytics - Vulnerability Assessment - Vulnerability/Threat Prioritization - Web-Application Security - Website Crawling ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base Software - Chat ## Category - [Vulnerability Scanner Tools](https://www.capterra.ca/directory/32775/vulnerability-scanner/software) ## Alternatives 1. [UserWay Accessibility Widget](https://www.capterra.ca/software/218549/userway) — 4.9/5 (333 reviews) 2. [Fidelis Elevate](https://www.capterra.ca/software/168954/fidelis-elevate) — 5.0/5 (1 reviews) 3. [Invicti](https://www.capterra.ca/software/171539/netsparker-web-application-security-scanner) — 4.7/5 (26 reviews) 4. [Nessus](https://www.capterra.ca/software/130577/nessus) — 4.7/5 (94 reviews) 5. [Chief Architect](https://www.capterra.ca/software/80035/chief-architect) — 4.4/5 (68 reviews) ## Reviews ### "As a Former White Hat Hacker, This Is One of the Most Impressive Security Tools I’ve Seen\!" — 5.0/5 > **Jeremy** | *September 30, 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The reports and tests are incredibly comprehensive and give you far more than just the basics. They also walk you through remediation particularly helpful for new people for things like DNS issues. > > **Cons**: As with any tool for security there can be false positives or context dependant findings. This is a problem with any automated tool. > > I’m coming at Decloak from a somewhat different perspective than the average user. I’m a technology industry professional and former white hat hacker, so I’ve spent enough time around security testing to know the difference between a scanner that spits out a pile of generic warnings and something that actually gives you useful intelligence. After putting Decloak through its paces across several of my own production sites and applications, I’m extremely impressed. First, an important qualification: Decloak does not replace a skilled professional penetration tester, nor should any automated platform claim to. Security findings can be contextual, false positives exist, and a human tester who understands an application’s architecture, business logic and threat model can investigate things automation cannot. But professional penetration testing can also cost thousands or tens of thousands of dollars. For the price point here, the breadth and depth of what Decloak provides is frankly remarkable. Its AI-directed crawler actually determines where to investigate rather than simply walking a static sitemap. One of my scans crawled 76 pages and analyzed hundreds of network requests. The reporting is excellent. You get an immediately understandable A-F score and severity breakdown, but you can drill into individual findings, affected locations, evidence and remediation guidance. Reports also include CVE/CWE/OWASP references and compliance mapping. The exported PDFs are genuinely useful documents rather than an afterthought. My reports included mappings for SOC2, ISO, NIS2, DORA, LGPD and PCI, along with DNS/TLS analysis, platform security and other appendices. DAST/Active Testing is where things get considerably more interesting. Instead of only analyzing what the application exposes passively, Decloak performs non-destructive probes for things such as forced browsing, CORS configuration, HTTP methods, reflected input, postMessage behavior, Subresource Integrity and sensitive-data patterns. That distinction matters because there is a huge difference between saying “this configuration might be risky” and actually investigating the behavior. AI Pentesting takes it another step further. Decloak can perform exploitation-confirmation testing using sandboxed security tools including sqlmap, dalfox, ffuf, nuclei and jwt\_tool. It also performs API discovery/testing for REST, GraphQL and SOAP endpoints. AppSumo’s listing correctly distinguishes this from DAST: active testing looks for plausible security signals, while AI Pentesting attempts sandboxed exploitation against confirmed findings, with independent scoring. I also really like the third-party and supply-chain visibility. Modern applications make requests all over the place, and Decloak inventories those domains, analyzes dynamically loaded scripts and checks external domains for reputation signals. This is increasingly important with modern SaaS and AI-built applications. Another standout is the platform-specific analysis. Decloak is looking for common problems involving platforms not merely applying a generic checklist to every website. If I could request one improvement, it would be context-aware feedback on findings. I’d love to click a potential finding and explain why it is intentional or not applicable in my architecture, then have Decloak retain that context for subsequent scans and AI analysis. Security is inherently contextual, so allowing the human operator to teach the system why a particular finding is a non-issue would make an already impressive platform even better. Overall, this feels less like another automated website scanner and more like a growing security workbench. Between agentic crawling, DAST, AI pentesting, API discovery, third-party analysis, remediation guidance, compliance mapping and genuinely professional reports, there is an extraordinary amount here. For developers, agencies, SaaS operators and technology companies that cannot justify having a professional pentester continuously testing every release, Decloak fills an extremely valuable gap at a fraction of the cost. Easy 5 stars from me. ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.ca/software/1244132/Decloak-Web-security-intelligence) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | ----- ## Structured Data